Jump to content

Microbiology and Biochemistry: Difference between revisions

From Lambic.Info
Nick (talk | contribs)
Nick (talk | contribs)
Line 29: Line 29:
==Saccharomyces dominance==
==Saccharomyces dominance==


After the pH falls below ~4.5 and the alcohol content rises over ~2%, [[Saccharomyces species]] take over as the dominant organisms in the wort, though Saccharomyces is present in large numbers well prior to the dissapearance of the enterobacteria. Saccharomyces will remain dominant until at least 6-8 months into fermentation, and will maintain a presence, though no longer active, throughout fermentation. Despite Saccharomyces' importance to the fermentation of Lambic, its concentrations remain below 10^7 cells per mL of wort, which is considerably lower than the 10^8 cells/mL found in commercial beers.<ref name=Oevelen77 >D. Van Oevelen, M. Spaepen, P. Timmermans and H. Verachtert, [http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/j.2050-0416.1977.tb03825.x/abstract|MICROBIOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF SPONTANEOUS WORT FERMENTATION IN THE PRODUCTION OF LAMBIC AND GUEUZE], 1977</ref><ref name="Guinard">Jean-Xavier Guinard, [[Books#Classic Beer Styles: Lambic|Classic Beer Styles: Lambic]], 1990</ref>
After the pH falls below ~4.5 and the alcohol content rises over ~2%, [[Saccharomyces| Saccharomyces species]] take over as the dominant organisms in the wort, though Saccharomyces is present in large numbers well prior to the dissapearance of the enterobacteria. Saccharomyces will remain dominant until at least 6-8 months into fermentation, and will maintain a presence, though no longer active, throughout fermentation. Despite Saccharomyces' importance to the fermentation of Lambic, its concentrations remain below 10^7 cells per mL of wort, which is considerably lower than the 10^8 cells/mL found in commercial beers.<ref name=Oevelen77 >D. Van Oevelen, M. Spaepen, P. Timmermans and H. Verachtert, [http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/j.2050-0416.1977.tb03825.x/abstract|MICROBIOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF SPONTANEOUS WORT FERMENTATION IN THE PRODUCTION OF LAMBIC AND GUEUZE], 1977</ref><ref name="Guinard">Jean-Xavier Guinard, [[Books#Classic Beer Styles: Lambic|Classic Beer Styles: Lambic]], 1990</ref>


As in controlled fermentation, Saccharomyces is responsible for most ethanol production and attenuation in lambic. The yeasts consume all the major sugars found in lambic wort (glucose, maltose, and some maltotriose). By the end of the Saccharomyces phase around 8 months, the ethanol content of the beer stabilizes at 5-7% by volume and will remain around that value until the end of fermentation[5,7]. Attenuation after Saccharomyces fermentation reaches 60-65%, which is known as the "attenuation limit" for conventional beers. Despite being responsible for most of the ethanol in Lambic, yeasts of the Saccharomyces genus are not responsible for most of the aroma and flavor compounds that give Lambic its distinct sensory characteristics.<ref name="Guinard">Jean-Xavier Guinard, [[Books#Classic Beer Styles: Lambic|Classic Beer Styles: Lambic]], 1990</ref>
As in controlled fermentation, Saccharomyces is responsible for most ethanol production and attenuation in lambic. The yeasts consume all the major sugars found in lambic wort (glucose, maltose, and some maltotriose). By the end of the Saccharomyces phase around 8 months, the ethanol content of the beer stabilizes at 5-7% by volume and will remain around that value until the end of fermentation[5,7]. Attenuation after Saccharomyces fermentation reaches 60-65%, which is known as the "attenuation limit" for conventional beers. Despite being responsible for most of the ethanol in Lambic, yeasts of the Saccharomyces genus are not responsible for most of the aroma and flavor compounds that give Lambic its distinct sensory characteristics.<ref name="Guinard">Jean-Xavier Guinard, [[Books#Classic Beer Styles: Lambic|Classic Beer Styles: Lambic]], 1990</ref>

Revision as of 18:30, 28 January 2015

← An Overview of Lambic

Spontaneous fermentation

The spontaneous fermentation of lambic is a complex process involving a succession of bacteria and yeasts that progresses along with the chemical changes that occur during fermentation.[1] The spontaneous fermentation process has shown considerable variability even among different barrels of beer from the same brewery,[2] though all spontaneiously fermented beers appear to follow a general sequence of microbes, which can be broken into four distinct stages:[3][4][2]

  1. An enteric stage, starting around three days after the boil and ending around 30-90 days, in which enteric bacteria dominate.
  2. Saccharomyces dominance, lasting from three to about thirty weeks, in which Saccharomyces cerveciae and other Saccharomyces species dominate the beer's yeast flora.
  3. Pediococcus dominance, lasting from 2 months onward, in which Pediococcus and other lactic acid bacteria dominate the bacterial flora.
  4. Brettanomyces dominance, lasting from 4-8 months onward.

A fifth stage of fermentation in the bottle after most Brettanomyces fermentation is complete may exist, however research towards the long-term aging of lambic is scant. The various stages of fermentation have a significant degree of overlap with one another as the yeast and bacterial populations live alongside one another, and the times at which they begin and end can vary by up to several months [2].

The microbes present in lambic may come from a variety of sources in the brewhouse and the surrounding environment, including the surrounding air, the walls and ceilings of the brewhouse, and the wooden barrels the beer is kept in [2]. The organisms in lambic are present in different parts of the environment and it is likely that the organisms responsible for lambic come from a number of different places.

Stages of Lambic fermentation

IMAGE FROM PAPER

The enteric stage

Lambic wort arrives in the coolship at approximately 5% sugar per weight of water, along with an assortment of proteins and fatty acids and other compounds.[5] Negligible ethanol is present prior to fermentation, nor is there much of the organic acids that will give lambic its characteristic tartness; the wort has a pH around 5, which is similar to the wort of other beers.[4] Enteric bacteria, including Enterobacter hormaechei, E. kobei, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Escherichia coli, are the first to gain a foothold in this environment, with significant numbers found after three to four days. The enteric bacteria primarily consume glucose, which reduces the gravity of the wort from ~1.050 to ~1.040 after the first three weeks.

Enteric bacteria are responsible for the production of acetic acid, and the pH of the wort falls from around 5 to 4.5 in the first week of fermentation. The 40 to 120 mg/L acetic acid found in the wort after the first week is very close to the amount found in the final product.[4] [6] Significant changes to the concentration of acetic acid should not occur until the ethanol has a chance to oxidize in aging in the bottle over many years or even decades.[7] The pellicle that forms on the top of the wort forms around ___ days, and may be the product of acetobacteria during the enteric phase,[9] though most other sources inidcate that the pellicle is the result of Brettanomyces (with Pichia and Candida).[8]

Low pH (below ~4.5) and an ethanol concentration higher than ~2% by volume is a hostile environment to the enterobacteria, and Saccharomyces species are able to dominate the flora in the wort once these conditions occur around 30-60 days into fermentation.

Saccharomyces dominance

After the pH falls below ~4.5 and the alcohol content rises over ~2%, Saccharomyces species take over as the dominant organisms in the wort, though Saccharomyces is present in large numbers well prior to the dissapearance of the enterobacteria. Saccharomyces will remain dominant until at least 6-8 months into fermentation, and will maintain a presence, though no longer active, throughout fermentation. Despite Saccharomyces' importance to the fermentation of Lambic, its concentrations remain below 10^7 cells per mL of wort, which is considerably lower than the 10^8 cells/mL found in commercial beers.[4][8]

As in controlled fermentation, Saccharomyces is responsible for most ethanol production and attenuation in lambic. The yeasts consume all the major sugars found in lambic wort (glucose, maltose, and some maltotriose). By the end of the Saccharomyces phase around 8 months, the ethanol content of the beer stabilizes at 5-7% by volume and will remain around that value until the end of fermentation[5,7]. Attenuation after Saccharomyces fermentation reaches 60-65%, which is known as the "attenuation limit" for conventional beers. Despite being responsible for most of the ethanol in Lambic, yeasts of the Saccharomyces genus are not responsible for most of the aroma and flavor compounds that give Lambic its distinct sensory characteristics.[8]

Other bacteria and yeasts also thrive during the Saccharomyces phase. Kloeckera and ____ both survive in considerable numbers alongside Saccharomyces. In the case of Kloeckera, the growth begins prior to Saccharomyces in the first days of fermentation, but are overgrown by Saccharomyces in the following weeks.

Pediococcus dominance

After the changing environment of the wort ends the growth of the enteric bacteria around ____ days, bacteria of the pediococcus come to dominate the bacterial flora. Lactobacillus can also be found in the wort in large numbers at this time, and both genuses are responsible for most of the Lactic acid in Lambic. Collectively these bacteria are known as the lactic acid bacteria.

The lactic acid bacteria increase in number until around month 7, achieving concentrations of ____ cells/mL wort, which is thought to coincide with the onset of summer and warmer temperatures. With this in mind, it is thought that the increase in lactic acid bacteria be delayed or hastened by decreasing or increasing the storage temperatures, respectively.[2][3]

Interestingly, lactic acid bacteria have been implicated in racemizing amino acids in beer, causing Lambic (and other beers which make use of lactic acid bacteria such as Berliner Wiesse) to have a high percentage of right-handed amino acid stereoisomers relative to both their starting materials and other beers.[5]

The Brettanomyces stage

Brettanomyces inherits the role of most prominant yeast genera from Saccharomyces around 8 months, and continues consuming sugar in the wort. Final attenuation can reach over 80% in lambic through the continued action of Brettanomyces, which is often referred to as "overattenuation" or "superattenuation". This is greater than is usually possible with Saccharomyces alone, as brettanomyces is able to metabolise sugars that Saccharomyces cannot, generally known as "dextrins".

Brettanomyces has been implicated in producing most of the aroma compounds in Lambic.[8] Sensory-significant quantities of ethyl acetate and ethyl lactate form at this time from ethanol entering into an ester bond with acetic and lactic acid, respectively. The esterization process is greatly helped by the enzyme esterase provided by Brettanomyces. However, the enzymatic esterization is highly reversible and esters found in high concentrations in the lambic prior to the presence of the esterase will achieve a lower equilibrium. This is the case with iso-amyl acetate, which is produced by Saccharomyces and is a characteristic odor compound in most other beers.[ref] Tetrahydropyridines (THPs) produced by Brettanomyces give Lambic its horse-like aroma, though the concentration and thus smell of THPs is variable.[ref, Heresztyn, 1986]

Refermentation in the bottle

Gueuze and other lambic bottled with either some residual sugar left unfermented at the time of bottling or added priming sugars will undergo significant fermentation in the bottle, though all unpasteurized lambic will continue to ferment to some degree there. For lambic bottled after about 8 months without additional sugar, the fermentation in the bottle progresses much as an extension of the Brettanomyces stage of fermentation and negligible carbon dioxide and ethanol production occurrs, leaving most of this lambic still. For lambic bottled younger and those with additional fermentable sugars added at bottling, considerable fermentation by Saccharomyces occurs in the bottle, causing marked increases in ethanol and the production of carbon dioxide, leading to a carbonated product [ref].

The reactivation of Saccharomyces fermentation at the addition of additional sugar indicates that the dominance of brettanomyces is brought about by brettanomyces ability to ferment sugars that Saccharomyces cannot. Once Saccharomyces has consumed most of the available ______ and ______ in the wort, it goes dormant, though does not die completely, and brettanomycs is free to assume the role of primary yeast in the wort. Upon the re-introduction of _____ and _____, the faster-growing Saccharomyces once again flourishes, until the again the fermentable sugar is consumed and brettanomyces and its other associated yeasts can once again resume the slow procress of the final fermentation.

Continued aging

The ongoing process of ageing of Lambic after its maturation is a very complex process and has both purely chemical as well as biochemical aspects. Much of the present literature is general to all beer.

Eventually even the slow-fermenting Brettanomyces runs out of fermentable sugars and fermentation draws to a prolonged close. The beer will continue to change and evolve over time, though minimal interaction with active yeast occurs. This stage is marked by oxidation and breakdown of the more complex parts of the yeast itself.[9] [10]

The decomposition of the yeast progresses primarily through the action of their own enzymes in a process called autolysis. Autolysis releases a large number of other enzymes, which has the secondary effect of breaking down many other components of the beer.[7] The release of esterase leads to the increased destruction of iso-amyl acetate and other esters, causing a loss of its light, fruity odor. Not all esters are broken down by this process, and a number of esters are formed during ageing. These include ethyl 3-methyl-butyrate and ethyl 2-methyl-butyrate which contribute a light floral or even tropical fruit odor.[11][12] The release of proteases by autolysis causes a breakdown of long protein chains, with its concordant thinning of mouthfeel and reduction in head. While autolysis is often seen as undesirable, it can contribute to a pleasant mouthfeel as well as some of the characteristic flavors found in very old Lambic.[13]

While oxidation can occur rapidly due to a break in the fidelity of the seal at the cork, oxidation can still occur without the passage of oxygen through the cork or significant oxygen gas in the headspace due to the transfer of oxygen from an oxygen-containing compound like ____ or ____ in the wort to others. The act of losing an oxygen, or more generally, of losing electrons, is called reduction. Reduction of ____ by ____ to (E)-2-nonenal (as well as other linear aldehydes) has been implicated as being of primary importance to the long-term oxidation of flavor compounds in beer,[14] which leads to a characteristic flavor of oxidized beer, commonly described as being of "wet cardboard". However, many other processes and compounds are important to the ageing of beer as well.

The Mailard reaction, also responsible for the browning of toast and steak among many other things, occurs in the unfermented reducing sugars left in the beer during extended ageing, leading to a darker brown color as well as a slight "burnt toast" flavor.[7]

Many other reactions occur as Lambic ages that are not elaborated upon here in the interests of brevity.

Sources of the microbes in Lambic

The microbes found in Lambic may come from a variety of sources, as nearly every surface and even the air found in the brewery are teeming with life. While the air above the coelship is often cited as the source of the microorganisms in Lambic, other sources are now known to play a significant role.

While there are many potential places that the wort can aquire its characteristic flora, some primary reservoirs to consider are:

  1. The air over the wort and in the cellar where the wort is aged
  2. The ceiling and walls of the facility, from which microorganisms attached to dust or condensation from the hot wort may find their way into the beer
  3. The surfaces of the barrels, both interior and exterior, as contamination from the exterior may occur during transfer of the wort.

with each reservoir potentially contributing different organisms to the lambic. Samples taken froma Lambic brewery indicate that the air above the koelschip and in the cellar is the primary source of the bacteria in the lambic, while the barrels host much of the yeast, though some yeasts are found in the air and bacteria in the barrels as well. [2]

Geographical variation

Discussion about geographical variation of microorganims goes here.

Brettanomyces shows significant genomic variation between strains, as well as a corresponding variability in their metabolisms, indicating that different strains of Brettanomyces bruxellensis will lend markedly different sensory characteristics to Lambic.[Insights into the Dekkera bruxellensis Genomic Landscape: Comparative Genomics Reveals Variations in Ploidy and Nutrient Utilisation Potential amongst Wine Isolates]

Seasonal variation

Little research exists correlating the season of brewing to changes in the microbiology and chemistry of Lambic, however a delay in the appearance of the late-fermentation bacterial flora in Lambic was observed when fermentation was started earlier in the brewing season, leading to cooler fermentation temperatures.[2] The flora were indistinguishible after 18 months.

Similarly, a study on spontaneously fermented ales in the United States revealed marked differences between ales brewed in the spring versus those in from the winter.[3] The flora broadly follow the same pattern of succession regardless of the season of innoculation, however genetic analysis showed distinct differences between the flora responsible for fermentation arriving in the spring and winter. The differences between the organisms found in the wort innoculated at different seasons were smaller than the differences arising from the elapsed time after brewing at sampling. By 36 weeks, there was no longer a noticible difference in the flora of ale brewed in the winter vs. that brewed in the spring.

Other spontaneous fermentations

Spontaneous fermentation is important to a wide variety of foodstuffs other than Lambic, ranging from very similar modern beers brewed in other parts of the world to cheeses and pickled vegetables.

American Coolship Ale, American Wild Ale, etc.

Spontaneously fermented beers from the United States (and occasionally other parts of the world) form a group of beers referred to as American Coolship Ales or ACAs.[3] ACAs vary in their intended similarity to lambic, with some American producers even going so far as to label their beers "lambics", while other ACAs bear little in common with lambic besides spontaneous fermentation. Due to the geographical separation between the United States and Belgium and the large variations in yeast and bacteria genetics between these different populations, even an ACA wort carefully prepared to be very similar to that of lambic will yeild notably different results after fermentation, even if the overall experience of the two styles of beer is similar.[3] [6] [4]

Spontaneous fermentation in other traditional drinks and foods

Other spontaneous fermentations exist as well, such as Chicha, a corn-based lightly alcoholic drink indigenous to the Andes. Much like the spontaneous fermentation of Lambic, Chicha posesses its own set of yeasts, dominated by strains of Saccharomyces responsible for its unique characteristics.[15]

Brettanomyces and other wild organisms, despite often being spoilage organisms in wine, are responsible for some major sensory characteristics of some wine styles.[16][17] Other minor yeasts found in Lambic, such as Pichia and Hanseniaspora have also been found in unspoiled wine.[16][17]

References

[2] The spont. ferment. of Lambic Beer

[4] The microb. diveristy of trad. spont. ferm. lambic beer

[5] MICROBIOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF SPONTANEOUS WORT FERMENTATION

[7] Characterization of aroma and flavor compounds present in lambic (gueuze) beer

  1. Jef Van den Steen, Geuze & Kriek: The Secret of Lambic Beer, 2012
  2. Jump up to: 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 F. Spitaels, A. D. Wieme, M. Janssens, M. Aerts, H.-M. Daniel, A. Van Landschoot, L. De Vuyst, P. Vandamme | The Microbial Diversity of Traditional Spontaneously Fermented Lambic Beer, 2000 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "Spitaels" defined multiple times with different content
  3. Jump up to: 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 Nicholas A. Bokulich, Charles W. Bamforth, David A. Mills. Microbiota Are Responsible for Multi-Stage Fermentation of American Coolship Ale, PLoS One, 7(4), 2012 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "AWAs" defined multiple times with different content
  4. Jump up to: 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 D. Van Oevelen, M. Spaepen, P. Timmermans and H. Verachtert, ASPECTS OF SPONTANEOUS WORT FERMENTATION IN THE PRODUCTION OF LAMBIC AND GUEUZE, 1977 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "Oevelen77" defined multiple times with different content
  5. Jump up to: 5.0 5.1 T. Erbe and H. Brückner, Chromatographic determination of amino acid enantiomers in beers and raw materials used for their manufacture, 2000 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "Erbe" defined multiple times with different content
  6. Jump up to: 6.0 6.1 J. Edwards and A. DiCaprio. When Beer Goes Sour: An NMR Investigation, Mestrelab MNova Users Meeting, SMASH – Atlanta, GA, September 7, 2014
  7. Jump up to: 7.0 7.1 7.2 B. Vanderhaegen, H. Neven, H. Verachtert, G. Derdelinckx The chemistry of beer aging – a critical review, 2006
  8. Jump up to: 8.0 8.1 8.2 8.3 Jean-Xavier Guinard, Classic Beer Styles: Lambic, 1990
  9. C. E. Dalgliesh, Flavour stability, | Proceedings of the European Brewery Convention Congress, 1977
  10. B. Vanderhaegen, H. Neven, H. Verachtert, and G. Derdelinckx, chemistry of beer aging – a critical review, 2006
  11. J. J. Bohmann Zum Alterungsverhalten des Bieres. 4 Teil, Kombinierte Alterungsversuche durch Begasung mit Kohlendioxid, Stickstoff, Luft und Sauerstoff, 1985
  12. J. J. Bohmann Zum Alterungsverhalten des Bieres. 3. Teil, Der Einfluß der Strahlungsbelastung, dargestellt am Beispiel 2-Methyl-2-buten und Isopren, 1985
  13. J. Robinson (ed) "The Oxford Companion to Wine" Third Edition pg 54 Oxford University Press 2006 ISBN 0-19-860990-6
  14. A. M. Jamieson, E. C. Chen, and J. E. A. Van Gheluwe, A study of the cardboard flavour in beer by gas chromatography, | Proceedings of the American Society of Brewing Chemists, 1969
  15. J. A. Vallejoa, P. Mirandaa, J. D. Flores-Félixb, F. Sánchez-Juanesc, J. M. Ageitosa, J. M. González-Buitragoc, E. Velázquezb, T. G. Villaa, Atypical yeasts identified as Saccharomyces cerevisiae by MALDI-TOF MS and gene sequencing are the main responsible of fermentation of chicha, a traditional beverage from Peru, 2013
  16. Jump up to: 16.0 16.1 M. Tristezza, C. Vetrano, G. Bleve, G. Spano, V. Capozzi, A. Logrieco, G. Mita, F. Grieco | Biodiversity and safety aspects of yeast strains characterized from vineyards and spontaneous fermentations in the Apulia Region, Italy, 2013
  17. Jump up to: 17.0 17.1 K. Medina, E. Boido, L. Fariña, O. Gioia, M.E. Gomez, M. Barquet, C. Gaggero, E. Dellacassa, F. Carrau | Increased flavour diversity of Chardonnay wines by spontaneous fermentation and co-fermentation with Hanseniaspora vineae, 2013