Changes

Yes. The answer is that yes, ''unblended lambic'' does exist, but in our view it still falls under the category of old and young lambic. In much the same way that Dutch and French speakers discuss lambic as lambic first and age second, there had to be some sort of reconciliation of the terms on this site. To that end, we have forgone using the term ''unblended lambic'' and instead have decided to use native language appropriate terms for each of the breweries discussed on [https://lambic.info Lambic.Info]. We have broken up any beer that is not specifically a g(u)euze, faro, or fruited lambic into their appropriate categories. Beers that are commonly labeled as ''unblended'' in English like [[De_Cam_Geuzestekerij|De Cam’s]] [[De_Cam_Geuzestekerij_Oude_Lambiek_De_Cam |Oude Lambiek De Cam]], [[Brouwerij_3_Fonteinen|3 Fonteinen’s]] bottled [[3_Fonteinen_Oude_Lambiek_(4_Year_Old)|4-year old Oude lambiek]], or [[Brasserie_Cantillon|Cantillon’s]] [[Cantillon_Grand_Cru_Bruocsella|Grand Cru Bruocsella]] are all various old lambics blended together and then bottled. This is a particularly important distinction when discussing bottlings of old lambic whose initial wort came from different breweries and/or brewdays but were blended together before bottling, thus contradicting the long-held definition of the style discussed above.

==Conclusion==