Cantillon Jean Chris Nomad 2011 - Revision history

Matthew: /* Bottle Log */

2025-06-25T15:10:54Z

Bottle Log

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:10, 25 June 2025
Line 15:		Line 15:
	== Bottle Log ==		== Bottle Log ==
	<center>		<center>
	{\| class="wikitable" border="1"
			{\| class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed wikitable" border="1" style="text-align: center; "
			\|+ Bottle Log
	\|-		\|-

	! Bottle date		! Bottle date
	(mm/dd/yyyy)		(mm/dd/yyyy)
Line 26:		Line 29:
	\| 01/07/2011		\| 01/07/2011
	\| 2011		\| 2011
	\| 750 mL		\| 375 mL & 750 mL
	\| Some corks are also confirmed as being marked '2010'		\| Some corks are also confirmed as being marked '2010'
	~~\| N/A~~
	\|-
	\|-
	~~\| 01/07/2011~~
	~~\| 2011~~
	~~\| 375 mL~~
	\|
	\| N/A		\| N/A
	\|-		\|-

Matthew: /* Description */

2025-01-21T23:15:51Z

Description

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:15, 21 January 2025
Line 3:		Line 3:
	__NOTOC__		__NOTOC__
	== Description ==		== Description ==
	Cantillon Jean Chris Nomad is a gueuze blended exclusively for the Miorge Mihoublon (sometimes hyphenated as Mi-orge Mi-houblon) beer store in Arlon, Belgium. It is a blend of three lambics of different years aged in barrels that previously contained red Bordeaux, white Bordeaux, and Côtes du Rhône wines. 1200 ~~liters~~ were bottled.<ref name="CantillonJCN">http://miorgemihoublon.be/jeanchris/ Cantillon - Jean Chris Nomad</ref>		Cantillon Jean Chris Nomad is a gueuze blended exclusively for the Miorge Mihoublon (sometimes hyphenated as Mi-orge Mi-houblon) beer store in Arlon, Belgium. It is a blend of three lambics of different years aged in barrels that previously contained red Bordeaux, white Bordeaux, and Côtes du Rhône wines. 1200 L were bottled.<ref name="CantillonJCN">http://miorgemihoublon.be/jeanchris/ Cantillon - Jean Chris Nomad</ref>

	== History / Other Notes ==		== History / Other Notes ==

Matthew: /* Bottle Log */

2025-01-16T16:34:26Z

Bottle Log

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:34, 16 January 2025
Line 26:		Line 26:
	\| 01/07/2011		\| 01/07/2011
	\| 2011		\| 2011
	\| ~~750mL~~		\| 750 mL
	\| Some corks are also confirmed as being marked '2010'		\| Some corks are also confirmed as being marked '2010'
	\| N/A		\| N/A
Line 33:		Line 33:
	\| 01/07/2011		\| 01/07/2011
	\| 2011		\| 2011
	\| ~~375mL~~		\| 375 mL
	\|		\|
	\| N/A		\| N/A

Matthew: /* Confirmed Counterfeit Bottles */

2025-01-16T16:34:12Z

Confirmed Counterfeit Bottles

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:34, 16 January 2025
Line 11:		Line 11:
	In June 2012, a thread was started on [http://www.beeradvocate.com/community/threads/counterfeit-cantillon-john-chris-nomad.23309/ BeerAdvocate] by a member claiming to have received a counterfeit bottle of Jean Chris Nomad 2011. The user contended that "authentic labels have razor-sharp graphics, whereas the counterfeit labels contain graphics which are granular and were printed on a high-quality printer" and that he also confirmed this with Jean Van Roy at Cantillon. The user later noted that one should ''"look very closely at the label, particularly the "Nomad" text. The red and black areas should be pure, and the transitions from black to red around the letters should be razor sharp, with no granularity or pixelization. The rear label should have a pure white background with sharp black text, even the extremely small text here is sharp on the genuine label. The counterfeit rear label has a slight pinkish background with less sharp text, the smallest of which, down at the bottom of the back label, is just a blur."''		In June 2012, a thread was started on [http://www.beeradvocate.com/community/threads/counterfeit-cantillon-john-chris-nomad.23309/ BeerAdvocate] by a member claiming to have received a counterfeit bottle of Jean Chris Nomad 2011. The user contended that "authentic labels have razor-sharp graphics, whereas the counterfeit labels contain graphics which are granular and were printed on a high-quality printer" and that he also confirmed this with Jean Van Roy at Cantillon. The user later noted that one should ''"look very closely at the label, particularly the "Nomad" text. The red and black areas should be pure, and the transitions from black to red around the letters should be razor sharp, with no granularity or pixelization. The rear label should have a pure white background with sharp black text, even the extremely small text here is sharp on the genuine label. The counterfeit rear label has a slight pinkish background with less sharp text, the smallest of which, down at the bottom of the back label, is just a blur."''

	In September 2015, just prior to Zwanze Day, Jean Van Roy and Chris Gillard of Miorge Mihoublon opened a purported ~~75cl~~ counterfeit Jean Chris Nomad given to the brewery circa 2012 alongside a bottle from the cellar at Cantillon and posted a summary on Facebook. The results confirmed that the bottle was indeed a bottle of Classic Gueuze from 2011. The front label was both slightly discolored and the corners more square than legitimate labels. The real Jean Chris Nomad reportedly presented more vinous notes from the barrels while the faked bottle was indisputably a Classic Gueuze.		In September 2015, just prior to Zwanze Day, Jean Van Roy and Chris Gillard of Miorge Mihoublon opened a purported 750 mL counterfeit Jean Chris Nomad given to the brewery circa 2012 alongside a bottle from the cellar at Cantillon and posted a summary on Facebook. The results confirmed that the bottle was indeed a bottle of Classic Gueuze from 2011. The front label was both slightly discolored and the corners more square than legitimate labels. The real Jean Chris Nomad reportedly presented more vinous notes from the barrels while the faked bottle was indisputably a Classic Gueuze.

	== Bottle Log ==		== Bottle Log ==

Matthew: /* History / Other Notes */

2025-01-16T16:33:20Z

History / Other Notes

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:33, 16 January 2025
Line 6:		Line 6:

	== History / Other Notes ==		== History / Other Notes ==
	Jean Chris Nomad was bottled in early 2011 and released for sale at the beer store in both ~~75cl~~ and ~~37.5cl~~ bottles. The entire Jean Chris series has been a collaboration between the Jean le Chocolatier chocolate shop and the owner of Miorge Mihoublon. Their stated goal with the series is to exemplify the personality of its namesake, "the south of France represented by Jean with refreshing and fruity beers, and southern Belgium represented by Christophe with a complexity of flavors and pronounced bitterness."<ref name="CantillonJCN">http://miorgemihoublon.be/jeanchris/ Cantillon - Jean Chris Nomad</ref>		Jean Chris Nomad was bottled in early 2011 and released for sale at the beer store in both 750 mL and 375 mL bottles. The entire Jean Chris series has been a collaboration between the Jean le Chocolatier chocolate shop and the owner of Miorge Mihoublon. Their stated goal with the series is to exemplify the personality of its namesake, "the south of France represented by Jean with refreshing and fruity beers, and southern Belgium represented by Christophe with a complexity of flavors and pronounced bitterness."<ref name="CantillonJCN">http://miorgemihoublon.be/jeanchris/ Cantillon - Jean Chris Nomad</ref>

	== Confirmed Counterfeit Bottles ==		== Confirmed Counterfeit Bottles ==

Adam: /* Confirmed Counterfeit Bottles */

2015-10-09T22:57:04Z

Confirmed Counterfeit Bottles

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:57, 9 October 2015
Line 11:		Line 11:
	In June 2012, a thread was started on [http://www.beeradvocate.com/community/threads/counterfeit-cantillon-john-chris-nomad.23309/ BeerAdvocate] by a member claiming to have received a counterfeit bottle of Jean Chris Nomad 2011. The user contended that "authentic labels have razor-sharp graphics, whereas the counterfeit labels contain graphics which are granular and were printed on a high-quality printer" and that he also confirmed this with Jean Van Roy at Cantillon. The user later noted that one should ''"look very closely at the label, particularly the "Nomad" text. The red and black areas should be pure, and the transitions from black to red around the letters should be razor sharp, with no granularity or pixelization. The rear label should have a pure white background with sharp black text, even the extremely small text here is sharp on the genuine label. The counterfeit rear label has a slight pinkish background with less sharp text, the smallest of which, down at the bottom of the back label, is just a blur."''		In June 2012, a thread was started on [http://www.beeradvocate.com/community/threads/counterfeit-cantillon-john-chris-nomad.23309/ BeerAdvocate] by a member claiming to have received a counterfeit bottle of Jean Chris Nomad 2011. The user contended that "authentic labels have razor-sharp graphics, whereas the counterfeit labels contain graphics which are granular and were printed on a high-quality printer" and that he also confirmed this with Jean Van Roy at Cantillon. The user later noted that one should ''"look very closely at the label, particularly the "Nomad" text. The red and black areas should be pure, and the transitions from black to red around the letters should be razor sharp, with no granularity or pixelization. The rear label should have a pure white background with sharp black text, even the extremely small text here is sharp on the genuine label. The counterfeit rear label has a slight pinkish background with less sharp text, the smallest of which, down at the bottom of the back label, is just a blur."''

	In September 2015, just prior to Zwanze Day, Jean Van Roy and Chris Gillard of Miorge Mihoublon opened a purported counterfeit Jean Chris Nomad given to the brewery circa 2012 alongside a bottle from the cellar at Cantillon and posted a summary on Facebook. The results confirmed that the bottle was indeed a bottle of Classic Gueuze from 2011. The front label was both slightly discolored and the corners more square than legitimate labels. The real Jean Chris Nomad reportedly presented more vinous notes from the barrels while the faked bottle was indisputably a Classic Gueuze.		In September 2015, just prior to Zwanze Day, Jean Van Roy and Chris Gillard of Miorge Mihoublon opened a purported 75cl counterfeit Jean Chris Nomad given to the brewery circa 2012 alongside a bottle from the cellar at Cantillon and posted a summary on Facebook. The results confirmed that the bottle was indeed a bottle of Classic Gueuze from 2011. The front label was both slightly discolored and the corners more square than legitimate labels. The real Jean Chris Nomad reportedly presented more vinous notes from the barrels while the faked bottle was indisputably a Classic Gueuze.

	== Bottle Log ==		== Bottle Log ==

Adam: /* Reported Counterfeit Bottles */

2015-09-20T16:34:57Z

Reported Counterfeit Bottles

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:34, 20 September 2015
Line 8:		Line 8:
	Jean Chris Nomad was bottled in early 2011 and released for sale at the beer store in both 75cl and 37.5cl bottles. The entire Jean Chris series has been a collaboration between the Jean le Chocolatier chocolate shop and the owner of Miorge Mihoublon. Their stated goal with the series is to exemplify the personality of its namesake, "the south of France represented by Jean with refreshing and fruity beers, and southern Belgium represented by Christophe with a complexity of flavors and pronounced bitterness."<ref name="CantillonJCN">http://miorgemihoublon.be/jeanchris/ Cantillon - Jean Chris Nomad</ref>		Jean Chris Nomad was bottled in early 2011 and released for sale at the beer store in both 75cl and 37.5cl bottles. The entire Jean Chris series has been a collaboration between the Jean le Chocolatier chocolate shop and the owner of Miorge Mihoublon. Their stated goal with the series is to exemplify the personality of its namesake, "the south of France represented by Jean with refreshing and fruity beers, and southern Belgium represented by Christophe with a complexity of flavors and pronounced bitterness."<ref name="CantillonJCN">http://miorgemihoublon.be/jeanchris/ Cantillon - Jean Chris Nomad</ref>

	== ~~Reported~~ Counterfeit Bottles ==		== Confirmed Counterfeit Bottles ==
	In June 2012, a thread was started on [http://www.beeradvocate.com/community/threads/counterfeit-cantillon-john-chris-nomad.23309/ BeerAdvocate] by a member claiming to have received a counterfeit bottle of Jean Chris Nomad 2011. The user contended that "authentic labels have razor-sharp graphics, whereas the counterfeit labels contain graphics which are granular and were printed on a high-quality printer" and that he also confirmed this with Jean Van Roy at Cantillon. The user later noted that one should ''"look very closely at the label, particularly the "Nomad" text. The red and black areas should be pure, and the transitions from black to red around the letters should be razor sharp, with no granularity or pixelization. The rear label should have a pure white background with sharp black text, even the extremely small text here is sharp on the genuine label. The counterfeit rear label has a slight pinkish background with less sharp text, the smallest of which, down at the bottom of the back label, is just a blur."''		In June 2012, a thread was started on [http://www.beeradvocate.com/community/threads/counterfeit-cantillon-john-chris-nomad.23309/ BeerAdvocate] by a member claiming to have received a counterfeit bottle of Jean Chris Nomad 2011. The user contended that "authentic labels have razor-sharp graphics, whereas the counterfeit labels contain graphics which are granular and were printed on a high-quality printer" and that he also confirmed this with Jean Van Roy at Cantillon. The user later noted that one should ''"look very closely at the label, particularly the "Nomad" text. The red and black areas should be pure, and the transitions from black to red around the letters should be razor sharp, with no granularity or pixelization. The rear label should have a pure white background with sharp black text, even the extremely small text here is sharp on the genuine label. The counterfeit rear label has a slight pinkish background with less sharp text, the smallest of which, down at the bottom of the back label, is just a blur."''

	~~It is unclear how many~~, ~~if any~~, of the ~~alleged counterfeit bottles were traded or opened~~.		In September 2015, just prior to Zwanze Day, Jean Van Roy and Chris Gillard of Miorge Mihoublon opened a purported counterfeit Jean Chris Nomad given to the brewery circa 2012 alongside a bottle from the cellar at Cantillon and posted a summary on Facebook. The results confirmed that the bottle was indeed a bottle of Classic Gueuze from 2011. The front label was both slightly discolored and the corners more square than legitimate labels. The real Jean Chris Nomad reportedly presented more vinous notes from the barrels while the faked bottle was indisputably a Classic Gueuze.

	== Bottle Log ==		== Bottle Log ==

Adam: /* Bottle Log */

2015-07-27T02:30:35Z

Bottle Log

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:30, 27 July 2015
Line 27:		Line 27:
	\| 2011		\| 2011
	\| 750mL		\| 750mL
	\|		\| Some corks are also confirmed as being marked '2010'
	\| N/A		\| N/A
	\|-		\|-

Ryan: /* Reported Counterfeit Bottles */

2015-01-17T15:37:28Z

Reported Counterfeit Bottles

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:37, 17 January 2015
Line 9:		Line 9:

	== Reported Counterfeit Bottles ==		== Reported Counterfeit Bottles ==
	In June of 2012 a thread was started on [http://www.beeradvocate.com/community/threads/counterfeit-cantillon-john-chris-nomad.23309/ BeerAdvocate] by a member claiming to have received a counterfeit bottle of Jean Chris Nomad 2011. The user contended that "authentic labels have razor-sharp graphics, whereas the counterfeit labels contain graphics which are granular and were printed on a high-quality printer" and that he also confirmed this with Jean Van Roy at Cantillon. The user later noted that one should ''"look very closely at the label, particularly the "Nomad" text. The red and black areas should be pure, and the transitions from black to red around the letters should be razor sharp, with no granularity or pixelization. The rear label should have a pure white background with sharp black text, even the extremely small text here is sharp on the genuine label. The counterfeit rear label has a slight pinkish background with less sharp text, the smallest of which, down at the bottom of the back label, is just a blur."''		In June 2012, a thread was started on [http://www.beeradvocate.com/community/threads/counterfeit-cantillon-john-chris-nomad.23309/ BeerAdvocate] by a member claiming to have received a counterfeit bottle of Jean Chris Nomad 2011. The user contended that "authentic labels have razor-sharp graphics, whereas the counterfeit labels contain graphics which are granular and were printed on a high-quality printer" and that he also confirmed this with Jean Van Roy at Cantillon. The user later noted that one should ''"look very closely at the label, particularly the "Nomad" text. The red and black areas should be pure, and the transitions from black to red around the letters should be razor sharp, with no granularity or pixelization. The rear label should have a pure white background with sharp black text, even the extremely small text here is sharp on the genuine label. The counterfeit rear label has a slight pinkish background with less sharp text, the smallest of which, down at the bottom of the back label, is just a blur."''

	It is unclear how many, if any, of the alleged counterfeit bottles were traded or opened.		It is unclear how many, if any, of the alleged counterfeit bottles were traded or opened.

	== Bottle Log ==		== Bottle Log ==

Bill at 04:46, 16 September 2014

2014-09-16T04:46:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:46, 16 September 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[File: Cantillon-JeanChrisNomad.jpg\|right\|200px\|Cantillon Jean Chris Nomad]]		[[File: Cantillon-JeanChrisNomad.jpg\|right\|200px\|Cantillon Jean Chris Nomad]]
	[[Brasserie_Cantillon#~~Beer~~\|← Cantillon]]		[[Brasserie_Cantillon#Beers\|← Cantillon]]
	__NOTOC__		__NOTOC__
	== Description ==		== Description ==
Line 52:		Line 52:


	[[Brasserie_Cantillon#~~Beer~~\|← Cantillon]]		[[Brasserie_Cantillon#Beers\|← Cantillon]]